==================================================== From: mep To: jfox-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, Hello Subject: [Jfox-developers] Re: [Jfox-developers] Re: [Jfox-developers] Re:[Instance Pool ] EJB Container中Instance Pool的几个问题 Date: 2003-11-4 13:48:00 ==================================================== to hello: 能够同时响应大量客户的并发请求,正是应用服务器追求的性能特征之一,如果仅 仅响应有限个客户的请求,就没有必要使用cluster、passivation等技术了。我提到的 请求排队,并不一定是显示的设定一个队列,可以使其他的形式,比如如果没有空闲的 线程,不调用accept或read,直到有空闲的线程为止。这样客户的请求实际上由OS来排 队了。至于DoS攻击是另外一回事。 Best Regards, mep http://www.huihoo.org/~mep ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hello" To: "mep" Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 9:11 AM Subject: Re: [Jfox-developers] Re: [Jfox-developers] Re:[Instance Pool ] EJB Container中Instance Pool的几个问题 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "mep" > To: > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 10:34 PM > Subject: [Jfox-developers] Re: [Jfox-developers] Re:[Instance Pool ] EJB Container中Instance Pool的几个问题 > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "founder_chen" > > To: ; > > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:21 PM > > Subject: [Jfox-developers] Re:[Instance Pool ] EJB Container中Instance Pool > > 的几个问题 > > > > > > > > > > 看完大家的讨论,对EJB > > > Container中的实例池有了更深的认识: > > > 一般做法: > > > 1. stateless session bean使用的共享实例池 > > > 任何stateless session bean都以于一个instance pool > > > 中的关联,使用后进行回收,如果超过pool的上限,就返回服务器忙 > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > 这里是不是将请求排队等待更合适,怎么能不响应客户的请求呢?:) > 我认为应该拒绝服务,抛出异常,因为这是设置的时候不预计的情况。否则设置池最 大值又有什么意义呢?况且每个服务器都有资源的上限,如果用队列排队的话,怎么保 证队列不会溢出?并且这样还可以防止DoS攻击 > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Jfox-developers mailing list Jfox-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfox-developers .